Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  103 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S99

of infections occurred after the engraftment (>30 days from TX)

(

p

= 0.02).

Conclusions:

Among pediatric HSCT recipients, viral respiratory

infections in the post-transplant period are frequent and some-

times prolonged. Preventive measures must be tightened in this

population in order to reduce the derived morbidity and mortality.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.196

Abstract no: 259

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 157

Normalizing ELISPOT to quantify human

cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Epstein Barr-virus

(EBV) specific T-cell response in kidney

transplant recipients

C. Fornara

1 ,

, I.

Cassaniti

1 , S.A

. Calarota

1 ,

K.M.G. Adzasehoun

1

, L. Scaramuzzi

2

, G. Comolli

3

,

F. Baldanti

1 , 4

1

Molecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology

Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San

Matteo, Pavia, Italy

2

Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit,

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

3

Molecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology

Department – Experimental Research Laboratories,

Biotechnology Area, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico

San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

4

Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and

Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy

Background:

Herpes virus infection or reactivation are major

complications in solid organ transplant recipients. Virus-specific

T-cell response is crucial to control infection.

Methods:

HCMV and EBV specific CD4

+

and CD8

+

T-cell

response were investigated in 29 kidney transplant recipients by

a novel approach of enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT).

Overlapping 15-mer peptide pools of HCMV proteins immediate

early IE-1, IE-2 and phosphoprotein pp65, and of EBV lytic (BZLF1

and BMRF1) and latent (EBNA1, EBNA3a, EBNA3b, EBNA3c, LMP1

and LMP2) proteins were used for stimulation of both CD4

+

and

CD8

+

HCMV-specific and EBV specific T-cells, respectively. Virolo-

gical and immunological monitoring were performed for one year

of follow-up.

Results:

As for HCMV infection, 13/19 (68.4%) HCMV seropos-

itive recipients showed levels of HCMV replication <100,000

DNA copies/ml blood and did not required anti-viral treatment,

while 6/19 (31.6%) HCMV-seropositive patients were treated since

showing

100,000 HCMV DNA copies/ml blood. Patients with

spontaneous control of infection showed, at 120 days after trans-

plant, levels of HCMV specific CD4

+

T-cells significantly higher

with respect to patients who needed treatment. HCMV specific

T-cell response to single HCMV proteins (pp-65, IE-1, IE-2) was

examined: pretransplant number of both CD4

+

and CD8

+

specific

T cells directed against IE-1 showed significantly higher level in

patients controlling infection and their level remained significantly

higher until 120 days. No difference was shown for pp-65 and

IE-2 between the two groups of patients. In addition, 5 HCMV-

seronegative recipients receiving organ from HCMV seropositive

donor (D+/R

), were examined: 4/5 developed a primary infec-

tion within one month from transplantation and required antiviral

treatment. HCMV-specific CD4

+

T-cells remained significant lower

with respect to patients able to control infection until 120 days after

transplantation.

As for EBV infection, 3/29 (10.3%) EBV-seropositive patients

reaching levels of EBV

10,000 DNA copies/ml blood did not

showed EBV-specific T-cell response for the entire period consid-

ered. However, EBV-specific T-cell response was detected in only

8/20 (40%) patients examined at 1 year follow-up, regardless of the

presence of EBV DNA in blood.

Conclusions:

Normalizing ELISPOT may be a simple and useful

tool to performimmunologicalmonitoring in solid organ transplant

recipients and to detect herpes virus specific response. However,

while the importance of HCMV-specific T-cell response to control

HCMV infection is evident, further studies are required to better

define the role of EBV-specific T-cell response.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.197

Abstract no: 272

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 158

BK polyomavirus-seroreactivity increases with

virus replication

H.F. Wunderink

1 ,

, E. van der Meijden

1

,

C.S. van der Blij-de Brouwer

1

, H.L. Zaaijer

2

,

A.C.M. Kroes

1

, J.I. Rotmans

1

,

J.N. Bouwes Bavinck

1

, M.C.W. Feltkamp

1

1

Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

2

Sanquin Blood Supply, The Netherlands

Background:

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection causes

nephropathy in 1–10% of kidney transplant recipients. This

condition results in graft-loss in up to 50% of cases unless immuno-

suppression is lowered. Specific antiviral treatment is not available.

In immunocompetent individuals, BKPyV resides latently in kidney

tubular epithelium after primary infection during childhood.

In order to predict which recipients will develop BKPyV

nephropathy, we recently analyzed a cohort of kidney donor-

recipient pairs prior to transplantation for several immunological

and virological parameters. That study showed a strong correla-

tion between the strength of BKPyV-seroreactivity measured in the

donor and BKPyV infection and nephropathy in the recipient

[1] .

We hypothesized that BKPyV-seroreactivity of the donors mirrors

the load of infectious virus in the transplanted kidney. To further

investigate the relation between BKPyV-seroreactivity and BKPyV-

replication, we analyzed the dynamics of BKPyV-seroreactivity in

individuals that did or did not experienced a detectable BKPyV

infection.

Methods:

A group of 101 kidney transplant recipients

was analyzed for BKPyV-seroreactivity (VP1-antigen; Luminex

immunoassay) and for BKPyV viremia (viral load measured by

q-PCR). Serum and blood plasma samples were obtained before

transplantation and at 3-month intervals until 18 months after. As

controls 87 healthy blood donors were analyzed with a 12-month

interval. Descriptive statistics and mixed model analysis was used

to analyze the association between measured peak BKPyV-loads

and BKPyV-IgG seroreactivity.

Results:

At baseline the overall BKPyV-seropositivity was high

in both transplant recipients (92%) and blood donors (99%). The

mean baseline BKPyV-IgG level in both groups was comparable.

In 85% of the kidney recipients, BKPyV viremia was detected at

some point during follow-up, with peak viral loads ranging from10

to 579700 copies/ml, while no viremia was detected in the blood

donors. After a year, in the healthy blood donors, the mean level

of seroreactivity remained the same (

p

= 0.929). This was also the

case among kidney recipients without BKPyV viremia (

p

= 0.981).

Among kidney recipients that did develop viremia, however, a sta-

tistically significant increase in BKPyV-seroreactivity was observed