Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S97

competent hosts but can lead to life-threatening conditions in

immunosuppressed patients.

We report a case of a fatal CMV infection in a 4-month old patient

with primary immunodeficiency and consecutive hematopoietic

stem cell transplantation.

Case report:

A 4-month old girl was referred for fever, failure

to thrive and bloody diarrhea. Since she was a child of consan-

guineous parents, severe immunodeficiency was presumed. CMV

was detected in the blood (day

82) with a viral load of 3.77

10E6 copies/mL (in-house real-time PCR) and treatment with gan-

ciclovir was started. As the CMV viral load still increased, therapy

was switched to foscarnet (day

33) and patient received CMV-

specific immunoglobulins. Antiviral resistance testing (genotyping

the UL97 protein kinase, responsible for ganciclovir phosphoryla-

tion, and the UL 54 DNA polymerase) in a blood sample on day

19

revealed the presence of a mixed population of M460V-mutant and

wild-type virus in the UL97 protein kinase, known to confer resis-

tance to ganciclovir with susceptibility to foscarnet and cidofovir.

Despite treatment, patient deteriorated further anddevelopedCMV

encephalitis with positivity of CMV PCR on cerebrospinal fluid (day

14), which showed a similar resistance profile as previously ana-

lyzed blood samples and nasopharyngeal fluid (NPA) samples.

An allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a haploidentical

donor was performed, with both donor and acceptor being CMV IgG

positive (day 0). Because of progression of neurologic encephalitic

disturbances suggestive of central CMV infection, cidofovir was

added empirically to the foscarnet antiviral treatment. Antiviral

resistance testing of a blood sample on day +1 showed, in addi-

tion to a mixed population of M460V-mutant and wild-type virus

at the UL97 protein kinase, also the presence of a mixed popula-

tion of 981–982 deletion mutant and wild-type virus in the UL 54

DNA polymerase. This is known to confer resistance to ganciclovir,

foscarnet and cidofovir. On day +19, only the mixed population of

DNA polymerase mutant virus bearing the 981–982 deletion was

present in blood. Three days later, the mutant virus totally replaced

the wild-type in multiple blood, urine and NPA samples, indicating

a generalized multidrug-resistance CMV infection. On day +23, cid-

ofovir was stopped due to severe cytopenia and further increase of

viral load. Since respiratory and liver function deteriorated further

and the patient developed an uncontrollable sepsis, palliative care

was initiated and the patient deceased on day +36.

Conclusions:

An immunosuppressed pediatric patient devel-

oped a multidrug-resistant CMV disease to currently approved

anti-CMV drugs. This case report highlights the importance of rapid

drug-resistance monitoring and indicates the urgent need for the

development of new anti-CMV drugs.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.193

Abstract no: 172

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 154

Changing time line of CMV infection in

seropositive live donor Liver Transplant

recipients: A prospective study from a tertiary

care liver center

Ekta Gupta

1 ,

, Nadeem Hasnain

1

, Yogita Verma

1

,

Niteen Kumar

2

, Ajeet Singh Bhadoria

3

,

Viniyendra Pamecha

2

1

Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver

and Biliary Sciences, India

2

Department of HPB Surgery, Institute of Liver and

Biliary Sciences, India

3

Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Liver

and Biliary Sciences, India

Background:

To study the incidence and timeline of CMV infec-

tions in seropositive live donor liver transplant (LTx) recipients and

correlate the risk of infection with pre-transplant CMV immunity.

Methods:

A total of 155 consecutive LTx recipients from our

Institute, a tertiary care Liver Institute in Delhi, North India

were included from March 2010 to April 2012. Patients were not

on anti-CMV prophylaxis. Nine cases died during the follow-up,

and thus the final analysis included 146 patients. Pre-transplant

donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV IgG titers were estimated by

Chemiluminescence based immunoassay (Architect, Abbott). Post

transplant, follow up was done weekly for 1 month, and then

monthly up to one year. Median time of followupwas 299 (

±

126.7)

days. CMV DNA was quantitated in plasma samples using the

LightCycler

®

480 II Real-Time PCR System (Roche Life Science, US).

CMV infection and disease were defined according to the standard

criteria. CMV DNA positivity in blood (DNAemia) was considered

as the evidence of CMV infection.

Results:

Out of 146, 114 (78%) were males, 132 were adults and

14 were pediatric recipients. Pre-Tx 142 (97.3%) were D+R+ and

4(2.7%) were D

R+. Post-Tx CMV infection was seen in 54 (36.9%)

recipients. CMV disease was seen in 14 (9.5%) cases. Median CMV

viral loadwas 3.6

×

10

3

(IQR: 3.4

×

10

2

–4.6

×

10

6

) copies/ml. Signif-

icant viremia of

500 copies/ml was seen in 45 (29%) cases. CMV

infection was higher in pediatric patients 10 (71.4%) than adults

44 (33.3%) (

p

value = 0.004). Monthly incidence of CMV infection

post-Tx was: 32 (59.2%) in 1st, 13 (24%) in 2nd, 5 (9.2%) in 3rd, 2

(3.7%) in 4th, 1 (1.8%) each in 5th & 6th months. Rejection was seen

in 30 (19.5%) recipients and was higher when CMV infection was

also present 18 (32.7%) as compared to without CMV infection 12

(12%),

p

= 0.002. A total of 113 (77.4%) cases had pre-Tx IgG titers

of

250 AU/ml. Post-Tx CMV infection in titers <250 AU/mL and

250 AU/mL were 42.4% and 34.5%, respectively (

p

= 0.99). There

was no difference in the time of occurrence of CMV infection in

both the groups (<250 AU/mL vs

250 AU/mL).

Conclusions:

Early CMV infections were seen mostly within 1st

month of post-transplant period in high seropositive population.

CMV infection does not correlate with pre-transplant CMV immu-

nity but may contribute in rejection of the transplanted organ.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.194