Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  99 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S95

Abstract no: 63

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 149

Intermittent HIV-1 low level viremia detection

(blips) using the Abbott RealTime HIV assay

J. Niubo

, J. Camara, A. Imaz, M.A. Dominguez

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Background:

The efficacy of highly active antiretroviral ther-

apy (HAART) is mainly monitored by the HIV RNA viral load (VL)

in plasma. Baseline low CD4+ and sustained low level VL (LLVL)

have a prognostic value for virologic failure. Moreover, persistent

LLVL during HAART is of great concern for potential emergence of

drug resistance. Conversely, intermittent detectable VL (“blips”) are

regarded as having low clinical impact and are no indication for

switching HAART. However, increased number and amplitude of

blipsmay lead to a rise in the economic costs ofmonitoring patients.

Aims of this study were to evaluate the rate of blips detection using

the Abbott RealTime HIV assay and to analyze their clinical impact.

Methods:

VL results from the VIH unit of the Hospital Univer-

sitari de Bellvitge (Barcelona, Spain) during the period 2009–2011

were included in the analysis. A blip episode was defined as a single

quantified VL detection of 50–2000 copies/mL preceded and fol-

lowed by <50 copies/mL samples, obtained from patients that were

under HAART therapy and had more than 1 year follow-up. Ethical

approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of

the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge.

Results:

During the study period, 1600 patients met the inclu-

sion criteria that accounted for a total number of samples of 13123.

Median age of the study populationwas 43 (range 17–86) and 77.1%

were males. A total number of 142 blips were identified in the

study population: 1.08% of all samples tested, and an 8.88% of the

patients. The blip rate remained stable during the three year study

period: 1.12, 0.85 and 1.29 respectively for the percentage of all

samples tested and 3.42, 2.44 and 3.64 for the annual percentage

of all patients. The median VL of blips was 72.5 copies/mL (range

50–1849) and an 83.8% of the detected blips showed a VL below

200 copies/mL (range 78.9–88.2%). Only 23 blip episodes showed

rebound above 200 copies/mL and thus, required additional diag-

nostic testings.

Conclusions:

The rate of blips, measured using the Abbott Real

Time HIV assay, was very low and remained stable during the study

period. The number of episodes requiring additional testing did

not have a relevant impact on the economic costs of HIV viremia

detection.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.189

Abstract no: 64

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 150

Comparison of genotyping tropism test in

paired HIV-1 plasma RNA and proviral DNA

from Portuguese patients

I. Diogo

1 , J. C

abanas

1 , M.

F. Goncalves

1 ,

A.P. Carvalho

1

, P. Gomes

2

, I. Costa

1

1

Molecular Biology Lab, LMCBM, SPC, HEM, Centro

Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal

2

Centro de Investigac¸ ão Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz,

CiiEM, ISCSEM, Almada, Portugal

Background:

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus type I (HIV-

I) infects the host cell, through a CD4 receptor that binds to the

gp120 glycoprotein and that requires contact with secondary core-

ceptors (chemokine receptors), CCR5 (R5) and/or CXCR4 (X4). The

viral tropism for HIV-1 is defined by the type of coreceptor used to

infect cell: R5, X4 or dual tropism.

Maraviroc (MVC) was the first R5 antagonist approved for the

treatment of patients. Viral coreceptor tropism determination is

mandatory when the use of CCR5 antagonists is considered. In

this context, in case a therapy change is necessary at undetectable

plasma viral load, tropism testing may need to be done on either

the proviral DNA or the latest plasma sample with sufficient viral

RNA; however, the experience with proviral DNA is still limited.

The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of genotyping

tropism test concordance between paired plasma HIV-1 RNA and

proviral DNA samples from Portuguese patients.

Materials and methods:

In this study, we aimed to evaluating

the genotypically inferred tropism in paired plasma HIV-1 RNA and

proviral DNA samples from244HIV-1 Portuguese infected patients.

HIV-1 genotyping tropism test used was an

in house

test.

Viral RNA was extracted from 1.0ml of plasma using a com-

mercial platform (NucliSENS easyMag, bioMérieux). Proviral DNA

was extracted using ZR Genomic DNA column kit. Viral RNA was

amplified by RT-PCR and proviral DNA by a PCR in the

env

gene.

Nested-PCR was performed in both cases to amplify the V3 region

of the

env

gene. Each PCR product was sequenced in triplicate.

Sequences were analyzed using the ChromasPro software. Tropism

was predicted using Geno2Pheno with a false positive rate (FPR)

cutoff of 15% for the plasma RNA and 20% for the proviral DNA.

Results:

From the 244 samples studied we obtained an ampli-

fication rate of 71.3% (174 samples). From these 174 samples, we

were able to amplify both plasma RNA and proviral DNA in paired

samples from 58 patients (33.4%). In this group, plasma viral RNA

and proviral DNA tropism test were concordant in 91.4%. 64.2%

of them were R5 and 35.9% X4 in both samples. Only 5 patients

had discordant tropism between RNA and proviral DNA. X4 was

mostly found in proviral DNA (3/5) and R5 mostly found in plasma

RNA (3/5). In 116 patients (66.7%) of the cases, we were only able

to detect tropism either in plasma RNA or proviral DNA. 82 were

detected only in the proviral DNA being 36, X4 and 46, R5. 37 were

detected only in plasma RNA being 15, X4 and 22, R5. In 19 samples

with viral load <20 RNA copies/ml we found 12 samples R5 and 7

samples X4 in the proviral DNA.

Conclusions:

This study showed a good concordance of the

tropism test between plasma RNA and proviral DNA (91.4%) in

paired samples as found by others. It seems that the determina-

tion of coreceptor can be done either in plasma RNA or in proviral

DNA. This test seems to be useful at any stage of the disease. Among

discordant samples, the presence of X4 is mainly found in proviral

DNA, but when the patients were suppressed, R5 is more frequent

in the proviral DNA than X4. This reinforce that prediction of viral

tropism using PBMC DNA is feasible, mainly for plasma suppressed

patients. Further studies are needed to determine the importance

of tropism testing in both compartments, plasma RNA and proviral

DNA.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.190