Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S47

Reference

[1] E. Brown, S. Lawson, C. Welbon, J. Gnanandarajah, J. Li, M.P. Murtaugh, E.A.

Nelson, R.M. Molina, J.J. Zimmerman, R.R. Rowland, Y. Fang, Antibody response

to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) nonstructural

proteins and implications for diagnostic detection and differentiation of PRRSV

types I and II, Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16 (2009) 628–635.

[2] J.Q. Chu, X.M. Hu, M.C. Kim, C.S. Park, M.H. Jun, Development and validation of

a recombinant nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA for detection of the antibody

to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, J. Microbiol. 47 (2009)

582–588.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.091

Abstract no: 52

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 52

Random access molecular diagnostics –

Increased efficiency in laboratory workflow and

translation of reduced result turnaround time

to patient benefit

G. Clark

, L. Anderson-Cable, M. Diggle

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United

Kingdom

The advent of molecular diagnostics for infectious diseases was

accompanied by the ability to drastically reduce the time taken to

produce a diagnostic result, with tangible benefits to the patient

pathway such as rapid administration of treatment and timely

infection control intervention. However, the majority of molecu-

lar diagnostic platforms for the diagnosis of infectious disease are

reliant upon batch processing in order to maximise cost effective-

ness or due to limited availability of staff. This batch processing

workflow limits the possible reductions in result turnaround time

and thus potential benefits to the patient pathway.

The DxN VERIS System by Beckman Coulter is a random access,

real-time PCR analyser for the combined extraction and quanti-

tative analysis of pathogen nucleic acid in clinical samples. The

system is designed to reduce staff hands on time and enable real-

time testing of clinical samples. In order to evaluate potential

reductions in turnaround time to result, improvements in labora-

tory workflow and the opportunity to re-optimise the skill mix of

laboratory staff the DxN VERIS System was evaluated in parallel

with current testing methodologies at the Nottingham University

Hospitals Microbiology department. Of the four assays selected

for comparison (HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and CMV quantita-

tion), significant reductions were demonstrated across all. Average

turnaround time reductions ranged from 36 h for CMV results, to

190 h for hepatitis B results and in most cases with VERIS analysis a

result would have been made available to the requesting clinician

on the same day as the sample request.

The issue of how result turnaround time directly affects the

patient is often not considered when evaluating a diagnostic plat-

form, but is becoming more important with recent initiatives to

implement timely and appropriate antimicrobial treatment and

necessary infection control precautions. The evaluation at Not-

tingham University Hospitals investigated this aspect further,

evaluating individual patient cases and demonstrating how a

reduction in turnaround time via random access testing could

directly translate to a positive impact on the patient care path-

way. Random access testing facilitates increased efficiency in the

patient’s care, timely intervention with appropriate antiviral ther-

apy and prompt decisions for future patient management.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.092

Abstract no: 54

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 53

Real-time multiplex PCR system detection of

viruses and bacteria in blood from febrile

infants <90 days of age

A. Hemmert

1 ,

, B. Kensinger

1

, E. Lo

1

, J. Oblad

1

,

G. Storch

2

, D. Schnadower

2

, R. Selvarangan

3

,

F. Hassan

3

, L. Heuschen

3

, D. Thomas

4

,

K. Newcomer

4

, J. Yi

5

, R. Jerris

5

, K. Stephens

5

,

A. Leber

6

, D. Cohen

6

, J. Daly

7

, S. Holt

7

,

K. Bouzac

1

, R. Crisp

1

1

BioFire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2

Washington University School of Medicine, St.

Louis, MO, USA

3

Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA

4

Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA

5

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA,

USA

6

Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

7

Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Background:

Fever in infants (<90 days old) is a common med-

ical problem that accounts for a large proportion of pediatric

emergency department visits. Because the symptoms displayed are

often non-specific, it is difficult to distinguish between viral syn-

dromes, serious bacterial infection (SBI), or non-infectious causes of

fever. Clinicians currently rely on a combination of patient history,

physical examination, and laboratory findings to identify patients

that are at a high or low risk of SBI. While this methodology is

intended to reduce unnecessary testing/treatment, most febrile

infants still receive extensive evaluation as well as hospital admis-

sion until a bacterial infection can be ruled out. A rapid, easy-to-use,

comprehensive diagnostic test could benefit patient care in this

vulnerable population by potentially reducing antibiotic use or

influencing hospital admission decisions.

To aid in the etiological identification for this non-specific syn-

drome, BioFire Diagnostics is developing the FilmArray

®

Febrile

Infant (FI) Panel for use on the FilmArray System. The FilmArray

FI Panel simultaneously tests for six bacteria and ten viruses using

200 L of blood. Two minutes of hands-on time are required and

comprehensive results are returned in about an hour.

Materials and methods:

245 blood specimens from infants,

90 days, with either a fever (reported temperature > 38.0

C) or

a blood/CSF culture where an SBI was suspected, were evaluated

in this study. This study was approved by each participating sites

institutional review board (IRB). Residual standard of care (SOC)

specimens as well as prospectively collected samples were tested.

Each blood sample was divided into two 250 L aliquots for Fil-

mArray FI testing and independent comparator PCR testing.

FilmArray FI results were compared to SOC laboratory results

as well as verified with independent PCR comparator assays. Any

discrepancies between the FilmArray FI Panel and comparator PCR

were investigated with additional bi-directional PCR sequencing.

Results:

There were 80 detections of virus or bacteria, across

the 245 blood specimens (33% positivity). Seventy-nine percent

(79%, 63/80) were viruses and 21% were bacteria (17/80). The

most frequently detected virus was enterovirus (17), followed by

human herpesvirus 6 (16) and adenovirus (7). The most frequently

detected bacteria were

Streptococcus agalactiae

(6),

Escherichia coli

(4), and

Staphylococcus aureus

(3). Blood culture identified 17 bacte-

ria, seven of which were common skin contaminants such as

Coagulase-negative

Staphylococcus

. FilmArray FI and blood culture

were in agreement of 4 of 8 shared results. Dual viral and bacterial

infections were observed in eight samples. The FilmArray FI Panel