Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S45

comparatively short turnaround time of two days the workflow

offers relevant improvements in HIV DRM detection.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.087

Abstract no: 351

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 48

Mass spectrometry of influenza virus using

clinically available MALDI-TOF platform

Andrei Musaji

, Richard Fahlman,

Carmen Charlton

University of Alberta, Canada

Viral respiratory disease caused by influenza viruses has an

importantmedical, epidemiological and economic impact on global

population. Ideal screening assays for influenza viruses directly

from clinical specimens must be not only of high sensitivity and

specify, but also must have short turn-around times (less than

two hours). In many laboratories, screening for influenza virus

directly from clinical specimens is based on express Direct Fluores-

cent Antibody Assay, which is quite specific, but not very sensitive,

when compared to RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase PCR). On the other

hand, nucleic acid amplification assays, such as RT-PCR, are not

characterized by quick turn-around times. Little is known if mass

spectrometry technology may be used as an alternative screening

approach for influenza virus identification directly from clinical

samples.

The main objective of our study was to analyse mass spectra

for influenza virus identification using a mass spectrometer, which

is routinely used in our Clinical Microbiology Diagnostic Labora-

tory for bacterial or fungal identification. In this preliminary study,

we used cell culture or egg-amplified influenza viruses as well as

their corresponding recombinant neuraminidase (NA) and hemag-

glutinin (HA) proteins. Mass spectrawere generated using clinically

available Biomerieux Vitek

®

MS MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer.

All proteins and whole viruses were pre-treated by lysis solution,

sonication, boiling and microwaving. Influenza viruses and their

corresponding HA and NA proteins were either directly applied on

MALDI-TOF target or a minimal pre-treatment with either formic

acid extraction and/or short trypsin digestion was used prior to

target application of samples. Overall, the turn-around time for

specimens was from less than an hour (without trypsin digestion)

to three hours (with trypsin digestion). Mass spectra for H1N1,

H3N2 and B influenza viruses as well as their corresponding HA

and NA were analysed. We used VENN diagrams to manually ana-

lyze spectra of HA and NA and the corresponding whole virus in

order to identify potential peak (m/z) candidates for the influenza

virus identification by MS MALDI-TOF. On average, three to five

peak candidates were identified for each influenza virus based on

mass spectra analysis of HA, NA and entire influenza virus mass

spectrometry.

Engineering and implementation costs for a mass spectrome-

ter, which may be used in a Clinical Microbiology setting and yet

possess a resolution capacity comparable to that of research use

only platforms, is quite lengthy and financially demanding proce-

dure. In this preliminary study we investigated whether already

clinically available mass spectrometer may be used for influenza

virus identification. We obtained a number of peak candidates,

whichmay be used for a peak database creation in the future exper-

iments. In the future, we are planning to identify influenza viruses

directly from virus-spiked clinical specimens as well as from clini-

cal specimens derived from symptomatic patients.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.088

Abstract no: 41

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 49

Increasing blood safety by diagnosing Zika,

Chikungunya and Dengue in times of massive

outbreaks

A. Latz

1

, M.E. Pereira

2

, R. Berlie

3

1

NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbach,

Germany

2

Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Marburg, Germany

3

NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH, Germany

The Aedes trio (Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika) are arthropod-

borne viruses that are transmitted by mosquitos of different Aedes

species (

Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus).

They have been reported

in Africa, the Americas, Asia and the Pacific Islands. Dengue virus is

a flavivirus, closely related to Zikawhereas Chikungunya belongs to

the alphaviruses. Dengue shares some clinical signs with Chikun-

gunya and Zika and they can be misdiagnosed in areas where these

arboviruses are common. As Dengue infectionmay cause a rash that

could be confused with other diseases such as Chikungunya, Zika

and measles, these other diseases do need to be ruled out. Diagno-

sis of Zika will first and foremost be by exclusion of other diseases

such as Chikungunya and Dengue, based on symptoms and travel

history. It is known that these diseases can also be transmitted by

blood transfusion. Since a great proportion of infected persons are

asymptomatic special care has to be taken in respect to blood safety.

Surveillance and testing algorithm for these three co-circulating

arboviruses are needed since they show high impact on the

socio economic burden in endemic countries. WHO proposed very

recently a testing guidance for laboratory detection and diagnosis

of these diseases. On 1 February 2016 the WHO declared a Pub-

lic Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) regarding a

recent cluster of microcephaly cases and other neurological dis-

orders and the possible association of these illnesses with Zika

virus infections. TheWHO recommended efforts towards improved

surveillance of Zika virus which is only possible with an accurate

diagnostic system for Dengue and Chikungunya as well.

Here we showhow the BEP

®

III and BEP 2000 Advance

®

systems

of Siemens Healthcare GmbH in combination with the Novagnost

®

ELISA assays can help in the management of outbreaks, proper

diagnosis of individuals and surveillance of populations at risk.

The combination of highly sensitive and specific ELISA

assays (Dengue IgG sensitivity >95%/specificity >95%; Dengue

IgM sensitivity 82,3%/specificity >95%; Chikungunya IgG sen-

sitivity >98.6%/specificity 100%; Chikungunya IgM sensitivity

>98.8%/specificity 100%/Zika IgM sensitivity >100%/specificity

98.2%) fulfills the criteria of the WHO testing guidance for high

throughput screening of these diseases and therefore seems to be

an excellent tool for surveillance of blood products.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.089