Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  84 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 84 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

S80

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

Aim:

To present, as preliminary results of the NSS, the

seroprevalence of IgG antibodies to hepatitis A virus in a

population-based cross-sectional study of Lisbon region residents.

Materials and methods:

Sample size was estimated based

on seroprevalence data from the previous NSS, sample has been

equally distributed by gender and assuming at least a precision of

5% and a design effect of 1.5. Serum samples from 304 participants,

153 of them females (50.3%), aged 15 years or more, resident in

NUTII area geographically corresponding to Lisbon region, were

tested for IgG antibodies to HAV (anti-HAV IgG), using ARCHI-

TECT HAVAb-IgG

TM

(Abbott), a chemiluminescent microparticle

immunoassay (CMIA). Study participant’s demographic data were

collect using a questionnaire and were registered in a database.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test with a

significance level of 5%.

Results:

Anti-HAV IgG antibodies were detected in 149 samples

representing an overall seroprevalence of 49.0% (CI 95%: 43.3–54.8).

Stratification by gender, age group and country of birth showed

no significant difference in seroprevalence distribution by sex

(male = 53.6%

vs

female = 44.4%;

p

= 0.136). By age group the sero-

prevalence ranged between 30.1% for 20–29 y/o age group to 87.5%

for

55 y/o age group (

p

< 0.001); a higher seroprevalence was

observed in individuals born outsideWHO European region (

n

= 15;

12/15 born in African countries) – 80.0%

vs

46.6% (

p

= 0.024).

Discussion and conclusion:

Our results are in accordance with

previous NSS findings and other published studies from same geo-

graphical region. A high seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG in older

individuals was expected and is explained by a more extended

period of virus exposure, including infancy and youth lived in a

period of higher hepatitis A incidence. Although tests to detect anti-

HVA IgG do not differentiate between post infection and vaccine

induced antibodies, vaccination rate is not expected to be high in

adults. Information concerning the low immunity rates at younger

ages and consequent susceptibility to HAV infection is of particular

relevance in times were travelling to highly endemic areas is more

frequent. Inmost of African countries HAV incidence is known to be

high which explains the findings for Africa born participants. Gen-

der similarity for HAV antibodies prevalence has been consistently

described showing a similar transmission pattern.

The NSS 2015–2016 is still ongoing and samples from further

regions and age groups are being collected and studied. At the end

this study will enable to establish Portugal’s resident population

immunity/susceptibility profile for HAV.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.158

Abstract no: 331

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 119

Single-step hepatitis C testing: Simplifying the

clinical pathway from primary care to specialist

services

Melinda Munang

1 ,

, Carol Atherton

2

,

Mohamed Elshabrawy

3 , Ma

moona Tahir

3 ,

Ras Smit

2

, Sowsan Atabani

2

1

Department of Infection, Heart of England NHS

Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

2

National Infection Service, Public Health England

Birmingham Laboratory, United Kingdom

3

Health Protection, Public Health England West

Midlands, United Kingdom

Background:

Direct acting antivirals have revolutionised treat-

ment opportunities for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)

infection. Accessing treatment requires timely diagnosis but preva-

lent laboratory testing algorithms in the United Kingdom require

two consecutive blood draws (1) serum for anti-HCV antibodies (2)

whole blood for HCV RNA. This 2-step process may increase attri-

tion rates in the clinical pathway for HCV-infected patients. At the

same time, recent advances in laboratorymethods now enable RNA

extraction directly from serum making single-step testing on one

blood draw possible.

Objective:

To compare 2-step versus single-step HCV testing

in terms of completion of testing algorithm and referral rates to

specialist services.

Design:

Uncontrolled before and after study of patients tested

for HCV infection in primary care (December 2013 to April 2016).

From 1 March 2015 samples with a first detection of anti-HCV anti-

body were simultaneously tested for HCV RNA.

Results:

The prevalence of anti-HCV antibody positivity was

similar throughout the study period (3.1% (141/4525) during 2-step

testing and 2.8% (115/4151) during single-step testing). Completion

of HCV testing for antibody positive samples with RNA confirma-

tion was 70% with 2-step testing while only a single specimen was

inhibitory in single-step testing. The overall proportion of patients

with detectable HCVRNAwas 53% (112/213) of whom13% (15/112)

were previously knowndiagnoses. For thosewith a first diagnosis of

active HCV infection, although there was no statistical difference in

referral rates to specialist services (88% (44/50) in single-step test-

ing versus 92% (43/47) in 2-step testing,

P

= 0.55) there was a trend

towards shorter time fromfirst blood draw to specialist assessment

with single-step testing (median time 80 days (interquartile range,

IQR 63–116) versus 140 days (IQR 56–272),

P

= 0.06). In addition

there were fewer unnecessary referrals to specialist services for

patients with no evidence of active infection although this differ-

encewas not statistically significant (6% (3/53) in single step testing

versus 16% (7/43) in 2-step testing,

P

= 0.09).

Conclusions:

Referral rates for specialist assessment and treat-

ment are high once diagnosis of active HCV infection is made.

However, 30% of HCV antibody-positive patients have unknown

infection status. This attrition rate from missed diagnoses is elim-

inated by single-step testing. Based on this quality improvement,

avoidance of repeat blood draws for patients and cost-savings from

unnecessary specialist assessment single-step HCV testing should

be standard of care in the HCV clinical pathway.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.159

Abstract no: 339

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 120

HEPATITIS E – Reaction or unspecific reaction?

Hanne Thang Vestergaard

1 ,

,

Charlotte Svaerke Joergensen

1

, Peter Ott

2

,

Anders Frische

1

1

Statens Serum Institut, Denmark

2

Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Background:

Hepatitis E (HEV) is not endemic in Denmark, yet a

substantial proportion of HEV patients have no travel history. Most

Danish HEV cases are serologically diagnosed. Especially among

elderly patients with competing diseases, the clinical interpreta-

tion can be difficult if a simultaneous fecal sample is PCR negative.

Reactivation among transplantation patients is well recognized

while possible recurrence among immunocompetent patients is

still debated

[1,2] .

Question:

We want to identify if patients presently investigated

for HEV have encountered HEV earlier in life, and whether the cur-

rent reaction can be due to a reactivation of the virus? To answer

the question concerning reactivation, we will test a number of sam-