Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts / Journal of Clinical Virology 82S (2016) S1–S142

S39

Abstract no: 267

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 36

Comparison of respiratory and

Meningitis/Encephalitis viruses detected by

FilmArray

®

multiplex PCR versus real-time PCR

Roger Koller

, M.T. Barbani, A.U. Lüthi, S. Zürcher,

J.F. Steinlin-Schopfer, S.L. Leib,

M. Gorgievski-Hrisoho

Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern,

Switzerland

Introduction:

Fast and reliable pathogen detection is important

for adequate management of infections. Although real-time PCR

(rtPCR) is usually the most sensitive method for direct pathogen

detection, it requires experienced technicians, includes several

working steps and has a turnaround time of multiple hours. There-

fore this method is not ideal for emergency diagnostics. The FDA

cleared, fully automated sample to answer, FilmArray

®

(FA) mul-

tiplex PCR system (BioFire/bioMérieux) detects a broad spectrum

of pathogens in

70min. To optimize our diagnostic services

during weekends and off-peak times, we compared the FA Respira-

tory Panel (RP) and FA Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel to our

routinely used rtPCR assay. The FA panels detect 20 respiratory

pathogens (17 viruses, 3 bacteria) in nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS)

and 14M/E pathogens (7 viruses, 6 bacteria,

Cryptococcus neofor-

mans/gattii

) in cerebrospinal fluids (CSF).

Materials and methods:

With FA we tested 84 retrospective

samples (23 NPS, 29 broncheoalveolar lavages [BALs], 32 CSF) and

60 prospectively collected NPS that required urgent testing during

the 2015/2016 flu season by FA and rtPCR. FA sample input volume

was 300ml for RP and 200ml forME. Commercial RP andME quality

control panels (MMQC Inc., Scarborough, USA), containing samples

positive and negative for each analyte detected by the FA panels,

were tested multiple times. For rtPCR, nucleic acids were extracted

from 220ml of sample and eluted in 55ml using NucliSENS easy-

MAG (bioMérieux). Respiratory viruses were analyzed by real-time

PCR using a combination of 7 duplex Respiratory Multi Well Sys-

tem r-gene

TM

(RG) assays (influenza A/B, RSV/hMPV, HRV&EV/cell

control, ADV/HBoV, HCoV/HPIV1-4) (Argene/bioMerieux), accord-

ing to manufacturer’s instructions. Additionally, we expanded FA

RP testing to include (BALs), by implementing one additional sam-

ple preparation step. CSF was analyzed for virus using laboratory

developed tests (LDTs) certified by the Swiss authorities.

Results:

RP andME quality control panel results were 100% con-

cordant with expected results. For all NPS, both tests, FA RP and

RG, identified one or more viruses in 45/83 (54.2%) samples. FA

RP and RG results correlated for 42/48 viruses detected (87.5%).

FA RP detected an additional 3 HRV/EV and RG detected addition-

ally 1 FluA, 1 ADV and 1 HRV/EV. Positive percent agreement (PPA)

between RG (laboratory standard) and FA RP for NPS was 93.3%

and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 92.7%. Overall correla-

tion was 93.2%. Results from BALs yielded 92% PPA, 93.1% NPA and

overall correlation of 92.4%. For FA ME testing, 31/33 CSF samples

had identical FA ME and LDT results with an overall correlation of

94.4%. FA ME did not detect 2 parechovirus low level LDT positive

samples (Ct 36.3 and 37.0). Using LDTs as the laboratory standard,

FA ME PPA and NPA were 93.9% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Results obtained with the FilmArray

®

RP and ME

panels were highly concordant with our currently used diagnos-

tic methods, demonstrating excellent performance. The simplicity

of the FilmArray

®

system, requiring less than 5min of hands-on

time, easy to read reports, and lowsample volume allows for testing

during off shifts and when urgent results are required. The compre-

hensiveness of the FilmArray

®

panels is ideal for diagnosing clinical

syndromes where there are many potential causes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.076

Abstract no: 273

Presentation at ESCV 2016: Poster 37

Cross-contamination and carry-over study

results obtained with ELITe InGenius, a new

sample-to-result solution for in vitro

diagnostics

C. Bittoto

, S. Costa, M. Enrietto, S. Patanè,

F. Gorreta, A. Estampes, C. Olivo, G. Stefanuto,

N. Scarr, W. Mahoney

ELITechGroup Molecular Diagnostics, United

Kingdom

Background:

ELITe InGenius

TM

(ELITechGroup Molecular Diag-

nostics) is a fully automated sample-to-result solution, designed

for the

in vitro

molecular diagnostics and monitoring of infec-

tious diseases. The system combines on a single platform: sample

processing (extraction and purification), PCR set-up, real-time

amplification and detection of multiple parameters for qualita-

tive and quantitative analysis, and result interpretation. Absence

of cross-contamination and cross-over was evaluated within

robustness study.

Material/methods:

ELITe InGenius features a universal extrac-

tion in a unitary cassette based format (ELITe InGenius SP200) and

multiple and independent Real-Time PCR with mixed parameters

including CE-IVD Real-Time PCR assays (ELITe MGB line) and Lab-

oratory Developed Tests. One to twelve patient samples can be

processed in 12 parallel trackswithin one run. Cross-contamination

and cross-over study protocols were designed in accordance with

FDA Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administra-

tion Staff Establishing the Performance Characteristics of Nucleic

Acid-Based In vitro Diagnostic Devices. The tests to evaluate the

rate of false positive included: (1) 30 high positive MRSA sam-

ples (10

7

CFU/ml, prepared by dilution of MRSA BAA-1720 strain)

tested alternating to 30 negative samples within five 12-sample

runs with MRSA/SA ELITe MGB kit; (2) negative MRSA samples

(

n

= 50) tested within five runs along with 1 positive and 1 negative

MRSA/SA controls per run with MRSA/SA ELITe MGB kit, and (3) 30

high CMV positive samples (10

4

IU/ml, prepared by dilution of the

“1st WHO International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus for

Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques”) tested alternating to 30

negative samples within five 12-sample runs with CMV ELITe MGB

kit.

All samples were tested carrying out the whole analysis

procedure: extraction, amplification, detection and result interpre-

tation with ELITe InGenius

TM

in combination with ELITechGroup

reagents.

Results:

All negative and all positive MRSA and CMV samples

were correctly identified by the system. 100% of concordance with

the expected results was obtained for all the samples tested.

Conclusions:

The results obtained demonstrated the total

absence of carry-over and cross-contamination of the system

even when high positive samples were tested. They confirm the

robustness and the reliability of ELITe InGenius for

in vitro

Molec-

ular Diagnostics testing.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.077